Kocaeli \u0130dare Mahkemesi Tapu ve Kadastro Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ar\u015fiv memuru olarak g\u00f6rev yapan davac\u0131n\u0131n, yerle\u015fmi\u015f oldu\u011fu K\u00fclt\u00fcr Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 K\u00fct\u00fcphaneci kadrosuna ge\u00e7i\u015f i\u00e7in muvafakat verilmemesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki i\u015flemi iptal etti. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda, \u201cBu durumda, davac\u0131n\u0131n kendisine tan\u0131nan ve \u00f6\u011frenimine g\u00f6re y\u00fckselme olanaklar\u0131 daha fazla olan g\u00f6revde bulunma hakk\u0131ndan yararlanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 nitelikteki atamaya, muvafakat verilmemesi yolundaki dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmamaktad\u0131r.\u201d denildi.<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
KOCAEL\u0130<\/p>\n
2. \u0130DARE MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
ESAS NO : 2013\/1<\/p>\n
KARAR NO: 2013\/951<\/p>\n
DAVACI :<\/p>\n
DAVALI : TAPU VE KADASTRO GENEL M\u00dcD\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc\/ANKARA<\/p>\n
DAVANIN \u00d6ZET\u0130 : Tapu ve Kadastro Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2026 B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u011fl\u0131 \u2026 Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde genel idare hizmetler s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131nda ar\u015fiv memuru olarak g\u00f6rev yapan davac\u0131n\u0131n, KPSS 2012\/1 yerle\u015ftirme sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na g\u00f6re K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 emrine k\u00fct\u00fcphaneci olarak yerle\u015ftirilmesine ra\u011fmen muvafakat verilmemesi nedeniyle atamas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin 01.01.2012 tarih ve 229737 say\u0131l\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemi ile 17.10.2012 tarih ve 21598 say\u0131l\u0131 Tapu ve Kadastro Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fleminin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada; \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 kurumda hizmetine ihtiya\u00e7 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, naklen atanmak istenilen kadronun mesleki ve; teknik e\u011fitime uygun, halihaz\u0131rda bulunulan kadroya nazaran \u00fcst bir kadro niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, dava konusu i\u015flemlerin hukuka ve e\u015fitlik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptali istenilmektedir.<\/p>\n
TAPU VE KADASTRO GENEL M\u00dcD\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc SAVUNMASININ \u00d6ZET\u0130 : 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 74. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince idarenin takdir hakk\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131 sonu itibar\u0131yla 1262 tapu ar\u015fiv memurlu\u011fu kadrosu bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen 550 personelle hizmet verildi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00fclke genelinde 712 davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u2026 Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc baz\u0131nda ise davac\u0131n\u0131n haricinde 1 tapu ar\u015fiv memuruna daha ihtiya\u00e7 bulundu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n muvafakat talep etti\u011fi kadronun halihaz\u0131ra bulundu\u011fu kadroya nazaran g\u00f6revde y\u00fckselme niteli\u011finde say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve; kariyer mesle\u011fi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu y\u00f6nleriyle dava konusu i\u015flemin hukuka ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uygun oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fi savunulmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/p>\n
Karar veren\u2026 2. idare Mahkemesince dava dosyas\u0131 incelenerek i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Dava, Tapu ve Kadastro Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2026 B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u011fl\u0131\u2026 Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde genel idare hizmetler s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131nda ar\u015fiv memuru olarak g\u00f6rev yapan davac\u0131n\u0131n, KPSS 2012\/1 yerle\u015ftirme sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na g\u00f6re K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 emrine k\u00fct\u00fcphaneci olarak yerle\u015ftirilmesine ra\u011fmen muvafakat verilmemesi nedeniyle atamas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin 01.11.2012 tarih ve 229737 say\u0131l\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemi ile 17.10.2012 tarih ve 215598 say\u0131l\u0131 Tapu ve Kadastro Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fleminin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanununun 74. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda; memurlar\u0131n bu Kanuna tabi kurumlar aras\u0131nda, kuramlar\u0131n muvafakati ile kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak dereceleri \u00fczerinden veya; 68.maddedeki esaslar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde derece y\u00fckselmesi suretiyle, bulunduklar\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131ftan veya \u00f6\u011frenim durumlar\u0131 itibariyle girebilecekleri s\u0131n\u0131ftan bir kadroya nakillerinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu, kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak derecelerinin alt\u0131ndaki derecelere atanabilmeleri i\u00e7in ise atanacaklar\u0131 kadro derecesi ile kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak dereceleri aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131n 3 dereceden \u00e7ok olmamas\u0131 ve memurlar\u0131n iste\u011finin \u015fart oldu\u011fu kurala ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
657 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 74. maddesi gere\u011fi kurumlar aras\u0131 yer de\u011fi\u015ftirme i\u015flemi kurumlar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 muvafakati ile sa\u011flanmaktad\u0131r. Bu h\u00fckme g\u00f6re kurum de\u011fi\u015ftirme talepleri bir memurun yeni bir \u00fcst \u00f6\u011frenimi bitirmesi, di\u011fer bir kurumun a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 kariyer nitelikli bir g\u00f6revin s\u0131nav\u0131n\u0131 kazanmas\u0131, mali imkanlar\u0131n\u0131n daha iyi olmas\u0131, \u00fcst g\u00f6rev olmas\u0131, kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin \u00f6zel ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re verimliliklerinin en y\u00fcksek olaca\u011f\u0131 ve; hizmetlerinden en y\u00fcksek oranda yararlan\u0131lacak bir birimde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 gibi \u00e7e\u015fitli sebeplere dayanabilmektedir.<\/p>\n
Memurun \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 kurumun muvafakat verip vermeme konusunda takdir yetkilerinin bulundu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesizdir. Ancak idarenin takdir yetkisi kullan\u0131rken kadro durumu, ihtiya\u00e7, atanacak ki\u015finin niteliklerinin de\u011ferlendirmesi gerekti\u011fi, aksine bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n bu hususta idareye tan\u0131nan takdir yetkisinin kamu yarar\u0131 ve hizmet gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131 ku\u015fkusuzdur.<\/p>\n
Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinden; \u0130stanbul \u00dcniversitesi Edebiyat Fak\u00fcltesi Bilgi ve Belge Y\u00f6netimi Program\u0131ndan mezun davac\u0131n\u0131n 2010\/1 KPSS yerle\u015ftirme sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na g\u00f6re\u2026 B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u011fl\u0131\u2026 Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc emrinde genel idari hizmetler s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131nda tapu ar\u015fiv memura kadrosuna atanarak g\u00f6reve ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131. 2012\/1 KPSS sonucuna g\u00f6re K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2026 \u0130li ta\u015fra te\u015fkilat\u0131na teknik hizmetler s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131nda K\u00fct\u00fcphaneci unvan\u0131yla yerle\u015ftirilmesi \u00fczerine davac\u0131n\u0131n 30.07.2012 g\u00fcnl\u00fc dilek\u00e7esiyle K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na\u2026 \u0130l K\u00fct\u00fcphaneci kadrosuna atanmak \u00fczere ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu, K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019nca davac\u0131n\u0131n atamas\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilebilmesi i\u00e7in Tapu ve Kadastro Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019nden muvafakat istenildi\u011fi, Tapu ve Kadastro Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 17.10.2012 g\u00fcn ve 21598 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemi ile personel ihtiyac\u0131 olmas\u0131, g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 birimde i\u015f hacmine g\u00f6re personel eksi\u011fi bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek davac\u0131n\u0131n atanmas\u0131na muvafakat verilmedi\u011fi, bu i\u015flem \u00fczerine K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 01\/11\/2012 g\u00fcn ve 229737 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemi ile atanma talebinin de reddedilmesi ve davac\u0131ya tebli\u011fi akabinde tarih ve say\u0131lar\u0131 belirtilen daval\u0131 idarelerin i\u015flemlerinin iptalleri istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri gere\u011fi memurun kurumundan muvafakat almas\u0131 halinde ba\u015fka bir kuramdaki g\u00f6reve atanabilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilmektedir. Ancak idarenin takdir yetkisi i\u00e7erisinde olan muvafakat verilmesi i\u015fleminde, belirleyici olan kriterin kamu yarar\u0131 ve hizmet gere\u011fi olaca\u011f\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphe yoktur.<\/p>\n
Memurlar\u0131n bir kurumdan di\u011fer kuruma atanmak i\u00e7in muvafakat istemlerinin reddine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemlerin yarg\u0131sal denetimde; kamu yarar\u0131 ve hizmet gerekleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde; ki\u015filerin e\u011fitim durumlar\u0131 ve y\u00fckselme olanaklar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmak suretiyle kadrolar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak bir kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma sonucunda bir karar verilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
Bu ba\u011flamda, memurun g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00fcksek \u00f6\u011frenim, edindi\u011fi bilgi ve; tecr\u00fcbeler do\u011frultusunda daha \u00fcst g\u00f6revi yapabilmesine olanak tan\u0131nmas\u0131 kariyer ilkesinin gere\u011fi olmakla birlikte ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenim sonucu edindi\u011fi bilgi ve beceri do\u011frultusunda \u00f6nceki g\u00f6revine g\u00f6re y\u00fckselme olana\u011f\u0131 bulunan stat\u00fcdeki mesle\u011fi ifa etmesi, bu suretle kamu hizmetinin b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve devaml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilkesi gere\u011fince, kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin \u00f6zel ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re verimliliklerinin en y\u00fcksek oldu\u011fu ve hizmetlerinden en y\u00fcksek oranda yararlan\u0131lacak bir birimde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131n kamu yarar\u0131na da uygun d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fi ku\u015fkusuzdur.<\/p>\n
Bu durumda, davac\u0131n\u0131n kendisine tan\u0131nan ve \u00f6\u011frenimine g\u00f6re y\u00fckselme olanaklar\u0131 daha fazla olan g\u00f6revde bulunma hakk\u0131ndan yararlanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 nitelikteki atamaya, muvafakat verilmemesi yolundaki dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Hal b\u00f6yle olunca naklen atanmas\u0131na muvafakat verilmemesine ili\u015fkin Tapu ve Kadastro Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn dava konusu i\u015fleminde hukuka uygunluk g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f olup, bu i\u015flem gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek davac\u0131n\u0131n naklen atanma talebinin reddine ili\u015fkin tesis edilen dava konusu K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fleminde de hukuka uygunluk bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, dava konusu i\u015flemlerinin iptaline, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da d\u00f6k\u00fcm\u00fc yap\u0131lan 290,90 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin daval\u0131 idarelerden al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine, posta \u00fccreti avans\u0131ndan artan k\u0131sm\u0131n karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinden sonra davac\u0131ya iadesine, karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren (30) g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 10.10.2013 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Kaynak: http:\/\/www.memurlar.net<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kocaeli \u0130dare Mahkemesi Tapu ve Kadastro Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ar\u015fiv memuru olarak g\u00f6rev yapan davac\u0131n\u0131n, yerle\u015fmi\u015f oldu\u011fu K\u00fclt\u00fcr Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 K\u00fct\u00fcphaneci kadrosuna ge\u00e7i\u015f i\u00e7in muvafakat verilmemesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki i\u015flemi iptal etti. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda, \u201cBu durumda, davac\u0131n\u0131n kendisine tan\u0131nan ve \u00f6\u011frenimine g\u00f6re y\u00fckselme olanaklar\u0131 daha fazla olan g\u00f6revde bulunma hakk\u0131ndan yararlanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 nitelikteki atamaya, muvafakat verilmemesi yolundaki dava konusu […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1096,1398],"class_list":["post-12529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genel","tag-arsivcilik","tag-bby-ozluk-haklari"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bbyhaber.com\/bby\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12529"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bbyhaber.com\/bby\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bbyhaber.com\/bby\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bbyhaber.com\/bby\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bbyhaber.com\/bby\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.bbyhaber.com\/bby\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bbyhaber.com\/bby\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bbyhaber.com\/bby\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bbyhaber.com\/bby\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}